I guess to this point I kinda of know what I can do better with all my projects. But I have to admit that not all projects are supposed to be perfect - there is no perfect design, it is just about how someone interpret the design and appreciate the cleverness in the design.
For this last project, still the cleverness is missing. Though the circulation is invented to reinvest the spatial property, but the whole thing is not responsive to the thermal impacts, and the whole thing is totally not thermal dynamically driven. The excuse I have is that it was thrown to me two weeks ago when I could not really understand and formulate my take on the continuous surface that my instructor liked. I should have been more opinionated about my design. I had a beautiful project with the hidden room, when she was not pushy and I developed my design to achieve the interesting spatial quality. Being systematic and diagramtic is not a problem, same with the parametric design method. actually the space created through diagram operation can be really beautiful, after all, architecture can be a diagram of all the forces. The cleverness, then, is the way we manipulate the spatial arrangement - for the most time the sectional property within a volume. The plan is the flow, while the section is the essence of variation in spatial experience.
I cannot tell if it is a good thing for me as a designer to have such a dictating instructor, and I have tried several method in design - antithesis leading concept, diagramatical operation, systematic aggregation, form dictating strategy...
After all, be self critical and radical, and always seek the cleverness in the design - being aware of what space you are creating, no matter what approach I am using and what path the project is leading towards, but accept mediocrity.
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
COMBING THROUGH THE PQ INTERLOPER
The previous scheme died because the systemiczation was too dominant and the beauty of architecture got lost in the rather diagrammatic production. Then my instructor sees a lot of potential in my PQ surface exercise. Therefore...I started over with my rather sexy surface.
The new surface is a combo of two identical surfaces with a extrusion and a recession along the central axis. The connection of the two surface is a simple hinge where the recession of one surface and the extrusion of the other meet, through which self shading is created. The shape of the surface is aiming towards maximizing the surface area for solar gain. Different shading conditions and degree of privacy are inscribed in the overall form. Circulation and aggregation opportunities are embedded in the grains of the discretization (horizontal) and and central axis (vertical).
Right now I need to work out the organization of the labs and clean up the circulation to make it a tight system - the integration of horizontal and vertical circulation.
Review Take-away:
1) Seek contradiction in a design to produce great architecture.
2) Interlacing of simple non-linear relationship that produces complexity/variation.
3) Produce otherness in synthesis, both geometrically and thermal dynamically.
The new surface is a combo of two identical surfaces with a extrusion and a recession along the central axis. The connection of the two surface is a simple hinge where the recession of one surface and the extrusion of the other meet, through which self shading is created. The shape of the surface is aiming towards maximizing the surface area for solar gain. Different shading conditions and degree of privacy are inscribed in the overall form. Circulation and aggregation opportunities are embedded in the grains of the discretization (horizontal) and and central axis (vertical).
Right now I need to work out the organization of the labs and clean up the circulation to make it a tight system - the integration of horizontal and vertical circulation.
Review Take-away:
1) Seek contradiction in a design to produce great architecture.
2) Interlacing of simple non-linear relationship that produces complexity/variation.
3) Produce otherness in synthesis, both geometrically and thermal dynamically.
The Misshapen Pearl: A Baroque Manifesto
The Baroque is a misshapen pearl: shining and attractive but somehow flawed. It is interested in systemization – mathematical understanding of space and development of perspective as a rational tool to systemize space. The systemization is not about the homogeneity but about relational heterogeneity bounded within a seemingly homogeneous field. That objects are qualitatively different even though they are composed of rather homogeneous elements, in the sense that it is rather the relationship is being examined rather than the objects as placeholders. The homogeneity of geometric space is reflected through the notion that all the points are mere determinations of position, they are purely relational rather than substantial reality, and there is no independent content of their own outside of this relation. It is liberation from the view of individuality to a web of relationships, a systemized singularity.
As a beautiful pearl of systemization, the misshapen aspect of the Baroque is embedded in its emanating quality and generating forces – the transformation from linear to painterly, from planar to diagonal recession, and from closed form to open form. It is about the tactile, plastic, loose, making shadow and light integral and superseding to contours as fixed boundaries; the diagonal, scenographic deployment of two or three point perspective, which engages the spectators in the spatial relationships and oblique views; architecture as an open system of relationships which involves the fabric of the city and the landscape.
The fact that Baroque is a synthesis of dynamism and the systemization concludes that it is a not a representation of a simple decoration system but rather a system that adopts multiple references: its nature as eclecticism. Baroque architecture is embedded in the tradition, and extends the tradition. Baroque finds multiple connectivity to different ornamentation/structure, spatial, typological references to infinity. It is a machine of making connections of all sorts: connectivity in addition to multiplicity and variation. It combines abstraction with realism, in an allegorized fashion; it connects corporeal realm to the spiritual/heaven realm. The visualization of such connectivity and synthesis would be the membrane that begins to stretch and almost folds back to itself – creating distortions to create different connections. The fold, multiplying the membrane to reach beyond the simple imagination plane is the generator to produce knowledge. The Baroque as misshapen pearl is a representation for itself as a fetish of complexity and contradictions, a marriage of systems and dynamism, and an allegory of seemingly objectivity in relation to the boundless infinity.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
CASE STUDIES - POROSITY
OMA- Tres Grandes Bibliotheque

The concept of their proposal resided in the notion of the library spaces being excavated as voids from a ‘solid cube’ containing the archives. The concept offered great architectural freedom, with the public spaces (or voids) being liberated from the constraints of a predeterminded structure or form.
STEVEN HOLL - SIMMONS HALL MIT

Holl’s design solution was that the building would metaphorically work as a sponge. It would be a porous structure that would soak up light through a series of large openings that would cut into the building so that light would filter through in section. These breaks in section would then become main interactive spaces for the students, providing views onto different levels. In his original drawings, Holl referred to these breaks as the building’s “lungs” as they would bring natural light down while circulating air up.
TOYO ITO - Taichung Metropolitan Opera House


Sunday, November 10, 2013
FIELD CONDITIONS
NATURE OF THE FIELD
A field should be a representation of a collective form that is a diagram of forces (the operations of energy) in equilibrium. Then it is essential to elucidate what forces are at work and to find the most appropriate ways to represent each force and the relation it entails. (e.g. magnetic lines, topo lines)
FORMAL RELATIONSHIP
A field condition would be any formal or spatial matrix capable of unifying diverse elements while respecting the identity of each (monads?). Field conditions are relational, and not figural, they are based on interval and measure. Field configurations are inherently expandable; the possibility of incremental growth is anticipated in the mathematical relations of the parts.
To retain the classical principle that hierarchical distribution of parts to whole is constant, and individual elements are maintained in hierarchical order by extensive geometric relationships in order to preserve overall unity. Geometry is the invisible scaffold that at once controls the distribution of parts, but disappears in the final building.
Basic repeatable blocks/units -> placed in the field that is reflective of the forces->hierarchical distribution of the units based on the assumptions associated with the forces within a single system-> extensive geometric relationships created by overlapping systems-> overall form is an elaboration of conditions established locally.
Generate a simple algorithm, and the run it out like what we did with the ARCH 1502 exercise.
A field should be a representation of a collective form that is a diagram of forces (the operations of energy) in equilibrium. Then it is essential to elucidate what forces are at work and to find the most appropriate ways to represent each force and the relation it entails. (e.g. magnetic lines, topo lines)
FORMAL RELATIONSHIP
A field condition would be any formal or spatial matrix capable of unifying diverse elements while respecting the identity of each (monads?). Field conditions are relational, and not figural, they are based on interval and measure. Field configurations are inherently expandable; the possibility of incremental growth is anticipated in the mathematical relations of the parts.
To retain the classical principle that hierarchical distribution of parts to whole is constant, and individual elements are maintained in hierarchical order by extensive geometric relationships in order to preserve overall unity. Geometry is the invisible scaffold that at once controls the distribution of parts, but disappears in the final building.
Basic repeatable blocks/units -> placed in the field that is reflective of the forces->hierarchical distribution of the units based on the assumptions associated with the forces within a single system-> extensive geometric relationships created by overlapping systems-> overall form is an elaboration of conditions established locally.
Generate a simple algorithm, and the run it out like what we did with the ARCH 1502 exercise.
LAB COMPLEX PROGRESS
I started off with the idea of how heat sources will create radiant zones and disturb the fields. Overlapping of radiation zones will create different thermal effects. The intersection of the zones were compelling in the grid. Therefore my instructor wants me to establish the wall grid and then embed the spaces inscribed like the intersection lines into the system.
1) Establish inhabitable walls as labs, and then - what are they?
2) put into elevator shafts to make academic promenade (for the crew); then set a cruise route (for visitors) that made out of voids and special views
3) embed large spaces as the program requires - new initiation for space making
Again, factors to consider:
1) Establish inhabitable walls as labs, and then - what are they?
- hierarchical relationships between the labs and infrastructural elements like Louis Kahn in the Richardson Medical center in Philadelphia (making the servant space evident)
2) put into elevator shafts to make academic promenade (for the crew); then set a cruise route (for visitors) that made out of voids and special views
- Gordon Matta-Clark: carve holes in the building.
- Rem Koolhass: bibliothique de France
- FEEDBACK LOOP: experience through different thermal zones.
- circulatory scenarios - hierarchy
- consider user group and experience
- denial of spaces and access to the spaces
- exchange and feedback loop implied
- threshold moments
3) embed large spaces as the program requires - new initiation for space making
Again, factors to consider:
- thermal dynamics
- circulation
- shading
- program
- site
I should go back to the original zoning TD concept and then follow my instructor advice in the way I process the sequence.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
POROSITY in BIO MEMBRANE
The new project is dealing with calibrated porosities, and I was asked to do a small presentation to introduce how bio membranes function as the porous precedence to mediate material and energy transfer.
- MEDIATOR between interior and exterior
- filter:
- animate matter (corporeal passage)
- invisible energy flows (light, heat, view, ventilation
- neurons
- manage relations
- OVERLAPPING SYSTEMS
- produced by an external set of demands
- and the logic of its interior circulatory flow
For the project, circulation of thermal energy through conduction, convection and radiation will motivate the circulation of people/air/light and heat - essentially it is a multi-system complex including
- Thermal dynamic hierarchy: 75 hot labs, 100 intermediate offices, 75 cold labs
- Room Function division: labs, common spaces, and offices
- Privacy: public, semi-private, and private (key card access)
- lighting: labs 25% direct, 50% indirect, 25% no; 50% of the building envelope remain shaded
- site
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)